![gary glitter movies gary glitter movies](https://bongorama.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/garyglitter.jpg)
Gary glitter movies movie#
In contrast, Joker isn't a film about Gary Glitter, and there's no moral benefit and only fleeting artistic benefit in the trade-off of paying him for use of his music.Another day, another Joker controversy: on the heels of a monster opening weekend in which the villain origin story raked in $96 million - the biggest October debut for a movie in history - the Todd Phillips flick is catching heat for its inclusion of a song by convicted pedophile Gary Glitter.
![gary glitter movies gary glitter movies](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1ndA0dghTBY/maxresdefault.jpg)
In that case, however, you could argue that Scorsese working with Belfort was a necessary evil in order for his film to get made at all and work as a criticism of the system with allowed Belfort to get so successful. Martin Scorsese's The Wolf of Wall Street was controversial for actually working with the financial criminal Jordan Belfort, enough so that the US government had to step in to take half of Belfort's earnings from the film and legally prevent him from receiving royalties.
![gary glitter movies gary glitter movies](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/6dcAAOSwfOdiq~0N/s-l400.jpg)
That this is just over a single music cue makes the artistic decision extra difficult to defend. However, the issue that this movie is arguably endorsing a criminal through music royalties complicates things. aren't aiming to inspire future criminals with their movie. In general, the argument that depiction is not endorsement is a strong one, but it's also one that needs to be made very carefully. RELATED: Joker Movie May Be Uncomfortable But Necessary Viewing For 2019 Critics who've seen the movie have been arguing intensely about these issues. Other commentators who've been worried about the movie are fearful that, even with the movie being clear that its protagonist is a villain, it might make him too sympathetic and end up celebrated by similarly unstable men in real life. Those excited for the movie are interested in the psychological study of a violent and unstable man, seeing such character studies as necessary for understanding such men without endorsing or encouraging them. Most of the discourse surrounding Joker has been arguing about the issue of depiction vs.
![gary glitter movies gary glitter movies](https://images.mubicdn.net/images/film/112037/cache-90560-1567170046/image-w1280.jpg)
While the artistic impulse to use his music in Joker might be understandable and even successful, is it worth it if it helps a criminal profit? With all of this real world background in mind, is it appropriate for Joker to use Glitter's music? While it's likely the 75-year-old Glitter is going to be spending the rest of his life behind bars, he is still earning royalties from the commercial usage of his music. Unlike with some other controversial musicians, there's no "Did they or didn't they?" benefit of the doubt to be argued about: the facts are clear that Gary Glitter committed multiple crimes against children. In 2015, he was found guilty of rape, attempted rape and indecent assault and sentenced to 16 years in prison. In 2006, he was found guilty of obscene acts with minors in Vietnam. The once popular British glam rock singer was charged with downloading child pornography in 1999. The problem comes when you look at what we know about Gary Glitter today. RELATED: Joker: Early Reviews Praise Phoenix's 'Astonishing' Performance The song's era-appropriate pop culture presence (for decades, it was used frequently to signify victories for many different sports teams in the United States) also serves as an understandable reason why it was chosen to underscore this moment. Variety's Owen Gleiberman describes it as "a moment of transcendent insanity." The Hollywood Reporter's David Rooney says it's the film's most memorable usage of Phoenix's body language and "almost balletic" sense of movement. Ignoring real world context, the scene is a winner.